Applications for bail are generally governed by the Bail Act 1985 (SA), which applies in respect of both South Australian and Commonwealth offences.
What is bail?
Bail is an agreement in which a person makes a written undertaking to the Crown. A person who is in custody because they have been charged with an offence or are involved in pending criminal proceedings may apply to be released on bail.
Pursuant to s 6 of the Bail Act 1985 (SA), in signing a bail agreement a person typically undertakes:
In general terms the two authorities that may grant bail are the police and the courts [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 5].
Police bail
A person who has been arrested can make a bail application to any police officer who is of or above the rank of sergeant or who is the responsible officer (officer in charge of the police station or a police officer who has been designated the responsibility by the officer in charge for people accepted into custody of that station) of the police station [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 5(1)(e)(iii)-(iv)].
However, a person is not eligible to apply for bail while being detained for purposes related to the investigation of an offence pursuant to the Summary Offences Act 1953 (SA). In that case, before applying for bail, they must wait until detention for that purpose has finished or until they have been charged with an offence [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 4].
A person who is refused bail may seek a review - see Refusal and review of bail decisions.
If a person has been arrested on a warrant issued by a court, and the warrant contains a clause prohibiting bail, then bail cannot be granted by a police officer [s 5(1)(e)(i)].
Further, if a person is considered a terror suspect (as defined in s 3B of the Bail Act 1985 (SA)) then only a court can grant that person bail, and a terrorism intelligence authority is entitled to be heard in the bail hearing [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 5(3)].
A person who is not released on bail by the police must be brought before a court as soon as reasonably practicable but in any event not later than 4.00 pm on the next working day following arrest [s 13(3)]. The person may then apply to the court for bail or for review of the refusal of bail.
Court bail
Any time a person appears before a court, that court has the power to grant bail. This is true whether:
Even if a person is not already in custody, a court may require them to enter into a bail agreement before they are free to leave the precincts of the court.
A duty solicitor can help people in police custody apply for bail in the Magistrates Court or the Youth Court. This might include:
Variation or revocation of bail
Although a bail agreement is intended to continue until the court proceedings have ended one way or another, the authority granting bail or the court can at any time vary the conditions of an agreement, or revoke it altogether (for example, where there is reason to believe that the person on bail does not intend to appear at court or because the person has committed a further offence).
The police officer who arrests a person eligible to apply for release on bail must:
An application for bail is made on a simple form which is available in both police stations and courts. The bail authority (the court or person to whom the application is made) can allow an application to be made in some other way (for example, someone who has any difficulty completing the form can ask to make the application orally) [s 8(1a)].
The police must give as much assistance as is reasonably required to anyone in their custody to complete a written application [s 8(2)(a)].
A child under 18 years can be assisted by a parent or guardian to apply for bail [s 8(2a)].
It is an offence to knowingly provide false information in a bail application [s 22].
Persons not eligible for bail
A person is not eligible for bail if they are:
Section 10 of the Bail Act 1985 (SA) provides a presumption in favour of bail. The presumption means that bail should be granted unless there are good reasons for its refusal.
The presumption does not apply to bail applications made upon lodging an appeal against a conviction or sentence, or where section 10A applies (see below).
The presumption in favour of bail is subject to the following considerations [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 10(1)]:
The presumption in favour of bail is also subject to the primary consideration of the need, or perceived need, of any victim of the alleged offence to be protected from physical violence [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 10(4)].
Section 10A of the Bail Act 1985 (SA) removes the presumption in favour of bail in certain cases, and requires the person applying for bail to convince the bail authority that there are special circumstances justifying bail before the bail authority can grant bail.
Section 10A applies if an applicant was taken into custody for:
Under section 10A(1a), a bail applicant who is a serious and organised crime suspect will not be taken to have established that special circumstances exist unless the applicant also establishes, by evidence verified on oath or by affirmation, that they have not previously been convicted of a serious and organised crime offence in South Australia or equivalent offence in another jurisdiction.
Pursuant to s 10AA, before granting bail to a person who has been charged with a child exploitation material offence, a bail authority must consider the harm that people who deal with child exploitation material cause to children by contributing to demand for the abuse of children.
The bail authority can question the applicant or any other person who may be able to provide information relevant to the application. If the bail authority is a court, it can take evidence on oath or affirmation from the applicant or any other person. It can also order a report about issues arising in a bail application. Such reports are prepared by officers of the Department for Correctional Services, or, in the case of a child, the Department for Human Services (Youth Justice).
Where a person released on bail becomes a terror suspect during the bail period, they can be arrested without warrant and upon arrest the bail agreement is taken to be revoked [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 19B].
Commonwealth child sex offenders
There is a presumption against granting bail for persons charged with, or convicted of, certain Commonwealth child sex offences [see Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 15AAA].
A bail authority must be satisfied that circumstances exist to grant bail, and must consider the matters outlined in section 15AAA(2) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) when determining whether such circumstances exist.
A person may be released on bail on their own undertaking, where they sign the agreement and personally guarantee to appear and comply with the conditions of the bail agreement. Sometimes, a guarantor is required.
A guarantor enters into a separate agreement known as a guarantee of bail, in which they guarantee that the person who is released on bail will comply with the bail agreement (or with specified conditions of the bail agreement). The guarantor may be required to forfeit a sum of money if the person on bail fails to comply with a term or condition of the bail agreement [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 7].
A guarantor must be at least 18 years of age [s 7(6)].
If a guarantor knows, or reasonably suspects, that the person on bail has breached a term or condition of their bail agreement, the guarantor must take reasonable steps to notify the police. Failure to do so may result in a fine as well as forfeiture of a sum of money [s 17A].
A guarantee of bail is a serious, binding obligation and a guarantor will only be released from an obligation in extreme circumstances. A guarantor can apply to the court to vary the conditions of the guarantee of bail or to revoke it at any time [s 7(4)].
It is a condition of every bail agreement that the person released on bail must not leave the State for any reason without the permission of the court before which the person must appear, or some other authority specified in the bail agreement [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 11(6)].
Every bail agreement is also subject to the following conditions:
These conditions may be varied or revoked if the bail authority is satisfied that there are cogent reasons to do so and there is no undue risk to the safety of the public [s 11(1a)].
A bail authority may require the applicant to surrender any firearm, ammunition or part of a firearm they own or possess [s 11A]. The maximum penalty for failing to comply with this direction is $10,000 or imprisonment for 2 years [s 11A(2)].
A bail authority may further impose any of the following conditions on a bail agreement [s 11(2)]:
There are additional conditions that must be included if the applicant for bail is a serious and organised crime suspect [s 11(2aa)] or has been charged with child sex offences [s 11(2ab)].
From 1 October 2024, a grant of bail to an applicant charged with an offence against s 31(2aa)(b) of the Intervention Orders (Prevention of Abuse) Act 2009 (SA) (a breach of a recognised domestic violence intervention order involving physical violence or a threat of physical violence) must include conditions requiring home detention and electronic monitoring [s 11(2ae)]. This applies to all bail applications where the alleged offending is committed on or after 1 October 2024. A grant of bail in such circumstances is uncommon as there is a presumption against bail for applicants charged with violent breaches of intervention orders - see Presumption of bail.
All conditions imposed must be written in the bail agreement [s 11(7)].
Conditions about the payment of money should not be imposed unless the bail authority is of the opinion that there is no other way to make sure that the applicant will comply with the agreement [s 11(5)].
If bail is refused, the bail authority must record the reasons for the decision in writing [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 12(1)].
Refusal of bail does not preclude further applications for bail [s 12(2)].
A person refused bail by the police or by a court constituted of justices may apply for a review of that decision by a magistrate. If bail was granted, the Crown may apply for a review [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 14(1), (2)].
The application is treated as a fresh application, and the court must hear and determine it as expeditiously as possible [s 14(3)-(5)].
In Crown applications, if counsel appearing for the Crown or a police officer tells the bail authority that an application for review is to be made, then the bail authority must delay the release of the applicant until after the review, or for a period of 72 hours, or a longer fixed period if the magistrate is satisfied that there is a proper reason for it [s 16].
If there is no magistrate in the immediate vicinity who can review the decision, the person can request, in writing, that the decision be reviewed by a magistrate over the telephone [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 15(1)(c)]. Police sometimes allow this without a written request, and where the original bail application was not required to be in writing then this application can also be made orally [s 15(4)] .
This type of review is primarily for arrests on weekends or in remote areas where a court is not readily available.
The police officer must contact a magistrate as soon as possible after the application is received. If the original police officer is not available, another police officer of or above the rank of sergeant or the responsible officer of the station must contact a magistrate [s 15(5)].
In the course of making inquiries and reviewing the decision, the magistrate must speak to the applicant for bail or any legal practitioner or other person representing or assisting the applicant [s 15(6)(c)].
When telephone review applications are not available
Telephone review of a bail application is not available to adults who are arrested and denied police bail if they can appear before the Magistrates Court by no later than 4pm on the next day [s 15(2)].
It also does not apply to an adult prescribed applicant and in these cases there is a presumption against bail [s 10A]. See Presumption of bail for a more comprehensive list of prescribed applicants covered by section 10A(2) of the Bail Act 1985 (SA).
The Supreme Court may review bail decisions on application by the applicant for bail or the Crown [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 14]. The review is treated as a fresh application, and the Court must hear and determine it as expeditiously as possible [s 14(2)-(5)].
In Crown applications, if counsel appearing for the Crown or a police officer tells the bail authority that an application for review is to be made, then the bail authority must delay the release of the applicant until after the review, or for a period of 72 hours, or a longer fixed period if the Supreme Court is satisfied that there is a proper reason for it [see Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 16].
The decision of a magistrate on review may itself be reviewed on application by the person refused bail or the Crown [s 15A]. A review may only proceed with the permission of the Supreme Court. Permission will only be granted if it appears there may have been an error of law or fact in the magistrate's decision [s 15A(3)].
See also Joint Criminal Rules 2022 (SA).
There is no further appeal from the Supreme Court refusal.
Arrest on non-compliance
When it appears to a court that a person has broken a term or condition of bail, the court can issue a warrant for the person's arrest [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 18(1)]. Upon the person's arrest, the bail agreement is taken to be revoked [s 18(4)].
A member of the police force who has reasonable grounds for believing that a person intends to abscond, or is contravening or failing to comply with (or has contravened or failed to comply with) a bail agreement, can arrest the person without a warrant [s 18(2)].
Penalty for non-compliance
A person who, without reasonable excuse, breaches, or fails to comply with, a term or condition of their bail agreement is guilty of an offence [s 17(1)].
The maximum penalty is a fine of $10,000 or imprisonment for 2 years. The penalty imposed must not be more than the maximum penalty that can be imposed for the offence for which the person is charged [s 17(2)]. For example, a person charged with disorderly conduct under s 7 of the Summary Offences Act 1953 (SA) faces a maximum penalty of $1,250 or imprisonment for 3 months. The maximum penalty for a breach of bail in relation to this offence is $1,250 or imprisonment for 3 months.
The penalty for a breach of bail is in addition to any penalty for the original offence and any order for the forfeiture of an amount of money that may have been specified in the bail agreement [s 17(3)].
When a bail agreement has been breached, an order for forfeiture can be made whether or not the person in breach of bail is charged with a bail offence [s 19(1)]. An order for forfeiture may also be made against a guarantor in respect of any amount of money specified in the guarantee [s 19(1)]. These orders for forfeiture are known as estreatment orders.
A person against whom an estreatment order has been made may apply to the court for the reduction of the amount or for the order to be rescinded [s 19(3)].
A bail agreement is terminated when the person is sentenced, or acquitted, or the charges are withdrawn [Bail Act 1985 (SA) s 20].
In other words, once a bail agreement has been applied for and entered into, it continues – unless police or the Crown apply for a review, or the agreement is revoked – until the charge against the person has been decided.